Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery
by
Moattari, Kevin
, Chern, Irene
, Vira, Shaleen
, Krol, Oscar
, Bortz, Cole
, Sciubba, Daniel
, Lafage, Virginie
, Pierce, Katherine
, Tretiakov, Peter
, Brown, Avery
, Imbo, Bailey
, Passfall, Lara
, Diebo, Bassel
, Lafage, Renaud
, Passias, Peter
, Adenwalla, Ammar
, Alas, Haddy
, Joujon-Roche, Rachel
, Williamson, Tyler
in
Abnormalities
/ cervical deformity
/ Diagnosis, Radioscopic
/ Health aspects
/ health-related quality of life
/ Original
/ patient report outcomes
/ Patients
/ Quality of life
/ radiographic parameters
/ Regression analysis
/ Spine
/ Surgery
/ Surgery, Experimental
/ Surgical research
/ Vertebrae, Cervical
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery
by
Moattari, Kevin
, Chern, Irene
, Vira, Shaleen
, Krol, Oscar
, Bortz, Cole
, Sciubba, Daniel
, Lafage, Virginie
, Pierce, Katherine
, Tretiakov, Peter
, Brown, Avery
, Imbo, Bailey
, Passfall, Lara
, Diebo, Bassel
, Lafage, Renaud
, Passias, Peter
, Adenwalla, Ammar
, Alas, Haddy
, Joujon-Roche, Rachel
, Williamson, Tyler
in
Abnormalities
/ cervical deformity
/ Diagnosis, Radioscopic
/ Health aspects
/ health-related quality of life
/ Original
/ patient report outcomes
/ Patients
/ Quality of life
/ radiographic parameters
/ Regression analysis
/ Spine
/ Surgery
/ Surgery, Experimental
/ Surgical research
/ Vertebrae, Cervical
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery
by
Moattari, Kevin
, Chern, Irene
, Vira, Shaleen
, Krol, Oscar
, Bortz, Cole
, Sciubba, Daniel
, Lafage, Virginie
, Pierce, Katherine
, Tretiakov, Peter
, Brown, Avery
, Imbo, Bailey
, Passfall, Lara
, Diebo, Bassel
, Lafage, Renaud
, Passias, Peter
, Adenwalla, Ammar
, Alas, Haddy
, Joujon-Roche, Rachel
, Williamson, Tyler
in
Abnormalities
/ cervical deformity
/ Diagnosis, Radioscopic
/ Health aspects
/ health-related quality of life
/ Original
/ patient report outcomes
/ Patients
/ Quality of life
/ radiographic parameters
/ Regression analysis
/ Spine
/ Surgery
/ Surgery, Experimental
/ Surgical research
/ Vertebrae, Cervical
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery
Journal Article
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Recent studies have evaluated the correlation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores with radiographic parameters. This relationship may provide insight into the connection of patient-reported disability and disease burden caused by cervical diagnoses.
Purpose: To evaluate the association between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and HRQLs in patients with primary cervical diagnoses.
Methods: Patients ≥18 years meeting criteria for primary cervical diagnoses. Cervical radiographic parameters assessed cervical sagittal vertical axis, TS-CL, chin-to-brow vertical angle, C2-T3, CL, C2 Slope, McGregor's slope. Global radiographic alignment parameters assessed PT, SVA, PI-LL, T1 Slope. Pearson correlations were run for all combinations at baseline (BL) and 1 year (1Y) for continuous BL and 1Y modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) scores, as well as decline or improvement in those HRQLs at 1Y. Multiple linear regression models were constructed to investigate BL and 1Y alignment parameters as independent variables.
Results: Ninety patients included 55.6 ± 9.6 years, 52% female, 30.7 ± 7kg/m2. By approach, 14.3% of patients underwent procedures by anterior approach, 56% posterior, and 30% had combined approaches. Average anterior levels fused: 3.6, posterior: 4.8, and mean total number of levels fused: 4.5. Mean operative time for the cohort was 902.5 minutes with an average estimated blood loss of 830 ccs. The mean BL neck disability index (NDI) score was 56.5 and a mJOA of 12.81. While BL NDI score correlated with gender (P = 0.050), it did not correlate with BL global or cervical radiographic factors. An increased NDI score at 1Y postoperatively correlated with BL body mass index (P = 0.026). A decreased NDI score was associated with 1Y T12-S1 angle (P = 0.009) and 1Y T10 L2 angle (P = 0.013). Overall, BL mJOA score correlated with the BL radiographic factors of T1 slope (P = 0.005), cervical lordosis (P = 0.001), C2-T3 (P = 0.008), C2 sacral slope (P = 0.050), SVA (P = 0.010), and CL Apex (P = 0.043), as well as gender (P = 0.050). Linear regression modeling for the prior independent variables found a significance of P = 0.046 and an R2 of 0.367. Year 1 mJOA scores correlated with 1Y values for maximum kyphosis (P = 0.043) and TS-CL (P = 0.010). At 1Y, a smaller mJOA score correlated with BL S1 sacral slope (P = 0.014), pelvic incidence (P = 0.009), L1-S1 (P = 0.012), T12-S1 (P = 0.008). The linear regression model for those 4 variables demonstrated an R2 of 0.169 and a P = 0.005. An increased mJOA score correlated with PI-LL difference at 1Y (P = 0.012), L1-S1 difference (P = 0.036), T12-S1 difference (0.006), maximum lordosis (P = 0.026), T9-PA difference (P = 0.010), and difference of T4-PA (P = 0.008).
Conclusions: While the impact of preoperative sagittal and cervical parameters on mJOA was strong, the BL radiographic factors did not impact NDI scores. PostOp HRQL was significantly associated with sagittal parameters for mJOA (both worsening and improvement) and NDI scores (improvement). When cervical surgery has been indicated, radiographic alignment is important for postoperative HRQL.
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd,Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd,Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd,Wolters Kluwer - Medknow,Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.