Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review
Do you wish to request the book?
Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review
2024
Overview
Background
Non-surgical chronic wounds, including diabetes-related foot diseases (DRFD), pressure injuries (PIs) and venous leg ulcers (VLU), are common hard-to-heal wounds. Wound evolution partly depends on microbial colonisation or infection, which is often confused by clinicians, thereby hampering proper management. Current routine microbiology investigation of these wounds is based on in vitro culture, focusing only on a limited panel of the most frequently isolated bacteria, leaving a large part of the wound microbiome undocumented.
Methods
A literature search was conducted on original studies published through October 2022 reporting metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) of chronic wound samples. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they applied 16 S rRNA metagenomics or shotgun metagenomics for microbiome analysis or diagnosis. Case reports, prospective, or retrospective studies were included. However, review articles, animal studies, in vitro model optimisation, benchmarking, treatment optimisation studies, and non-clinical studies were excluded. Articles were identified in PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Microsoft Academic, Crossref and Semantic Scholar databases.
Results
Of the 3,202 articles found in the initial search, 2,336 articles were removed after deduplication and 834 articles following title and abstract screening. A further 14 were removed after full text reading, with 18 articles finally included. Data were provided for 3,628 patients, including 1,535 DRFDs, 956 VLUs, and 791 PIs, with 164 microbial genera and 116 species identified using mNGS approaches. A high microbial diversity was observed depending on the geographical location and wound evolution. Clinically infected wounds were the most diverse, possibly due to a widespread colonisation by pathogenic bacteria from body and environmental microbiota. mNGS data identified the presence of virus (EBV) and fungi (
Candida
and
Aspergillus
species), as well as
Staphylococcus
and
Pseudomonas
bacteriophages.
Conclusion
This study highlighted the benefit of mNGS for time-effective pathogen genome detection. Despite the majority of the included studies investigating only 16 S rDNA, ignoring a part of viral, fungal and parasite colonisation, mNGS detected a large number of bacteria through the included studies. Such technology could be implemented in routine microbiology for hard-to-heal wound microbiota investigation and post-treatment wound colonisation surveillance.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
Subject
/ Analysis
/ Bacteria - isolation & purification
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Diabetic Foot - microbiology
/ Genomics
/ High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ Humans
/ Microbial Genetics and Genomics
/ Microbiology and Parasitology
/ Non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds
/ Pressure Ulcer - microbiology
/ Review
/ Shotgun metagenomics, microbial diversity
/ Varicose Ulcer - microbiology
