Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture
Do you wish to request the book?
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound to assess cerebrovascular reactivity: reliability, reproducibility and effect of posture
2013
Overview
Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) allows measurement of blood flow velocities in the intracranial vessels, and can be used to assess cerebral vasodilator responses to a hypercapnic stimulus. The reliability of this technique has not been established, nor is there agreement about whether the technique should be performed in sitting or lying postures. We tested the intra- and inter-rater reliability of measures of cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in 10 healthy adults, in sitting and lying postures. Participants underwent triplicate bilateral ultrasound assessment of flow velocities in the middle cerebral arteries whilst sitting and lying supine prior to and during inhalation of Carbogen (5% CO2, 95% O2) for 2 min. This procedure was performed twice by each of two raters for a total of four sessions. CVR was calculated as the difference between baseline and the peak blood flow velocity attained during CO2 inhalation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra-rater reliability were greater sitting than lying for both raters (e.g. Rater 1 ICC sitting = 0.822, lying = 0.734), and inter-rater reliability was also greater in sitting (e.g. sitting ICC = 0.504, lying = 0.081). These results suggest that assessment of CVR using TCD should be performed with participants sitting in order to maximise CVR measurement reliability.
