MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial
Journal Article

Effect of reverse Trendelenburg position and positive pressure ventilation on safe non-hypoxic apnea period in obese, a randomized-control trial

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose There is an elevated incidence of hypoxemia during the airway management of the morbidly obese. We aimed to assess whether optimizing body position and ventilation during pre-oxygenation allow a longer safe non-hypoxic apnea period (SNHAP). Methods Fifty morbidly obese patients were recruited and randomized for this study. Patients were positioned and preoxygenated for three minutes in the ramp position associated with spontaneous breathing without additional CPAP or PEEP (RP/ZEEP group) or in the reverse Trendelenburg position associated with pressure support ventilation mode with pressure support of 8 cmH 2 O and an additional 10 cmH 2 O of PEEP while breathing spontaneously (RT/PPV group) according to randomization. Results The SNHAP was significantly longer in the RT/PPV group (258.2 (55.1) vs. 216.7 (42.3) seconds, p  = 0.005). The RT/PPV group was also associated to a shorter time to obtain a fractional end-tidal oxygen concentration (FEtO 2 ) of 0.90 (85.1(47.8) vs 145.3(40.8) seconds, p  < 0.0001), a higher proportion of patients that reached the satisfactory FEtO 2 of 0.90 (21/24, 88% vs. 13/24, 54%, p  = 0.024), a higher FEtO 2 during preoxygenation (0.91(0.05) vs. 0.89(0.01), p  = 0.003) and a faster return to 97% oxygen saturation after ventilation resumption (69.8 (24.2) vs. 91.4 (39.2) seconds, p  = 0.038). Conclusion In the morbidly obese population, RT/PPV, compared to RP/ZEEP, lengthens the SNHAP, decreases the time to obtain optimal preoxygenation conditions, and allows a faster resuming of secure oxygen saturation. The former combination allows a more significant margin of time for endotracheal intubation and minimizes the risk of hypoxemia in this highly vulnerable population. Trial registration NCT02590406, 29/10/2015.