Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
Do you wish to request the book?
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
2019
Overview
Background
The global shortage of surgeons disproportionately impacts low- and middle-income countries. To mitigate this, Zambia introduced a ‘task-shifting’ solution and started to train non-physician clinicians (NPCs) called medical licentiates (ML) to perform surgery. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to assess their contribution to the delivery of surgical care in rural hospitals in Zambia.
Methods
Sixteen hospitals were randomly assigned to intervention and control arms of the study. Nine MLs were deployed to eight intervention sites. Crude numbers of selected major surgical procedures between intervention and control sites were compared before and after the intervention. Volume and outcomes of surgery were compared within intervention hospitals, between NPCs and surgically active medical doctors (MDs).
Results
There was a significant increase in the numbers of caesarean sections (CS) in the intervention hospitals (+ 15.2%) and a drop by almost half in the control group (− 47%) (
P
= 0.015), between the two time periods. There were marginal shifts in the numbers of index procedures: a small drop in the intervention group (− 4.9%) and slight increase in the control arm (+ 4.8%) (
P
= 0.505). In all pairs, MLs had higher mean number of CS and other major surgical cases done in the intervention period compared with MDs. There was no significant difference in postoperative wound infection rates for CS (
P
= 0.884) and other major surgical cases (
P
= 0.33) at intervention hospitals between MLs and MDs.
Conclusion
This study provided evidence that the ML training programme in Zambia is an effective and safe way to bridge the gap in rural hospitals between the demand and the limited availability of surgically trained workforce in the country. Such evidence is greatly needed as more developing countries are developing national surgical plans.
Trial registration
ISRCTN66099597 Registered: 07/01/2014
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,BMC
Subject
/ Allied Health Personnel - supply & distribution
/ Delegation, Professional - statistics & numerical data
/ Health Workforce - statistics & numerical data
/ Humans
/ Malawi
/ Medicine
/ Practice
/ Practice and Hospital Management
/ Surgeons
/ Surgery
/ Surgical Procedures, Operative - statistics & numerical data
/ Training
/ Wounds
/ Zambia
