Journal Article

The Australian clinical trial landscape: Perceptions of rural, regional and remote health service capacity and capability

Graffini, Jenna, Johnston, Karen, Larkins, Sarah, Farrington, Alison, McPhail, Steven M.

2024

Overview

Background Access to clinical trials is limited for rural, regional and remote Australians, adding to the current health inequity between rural and metropolitan populations. The Australasian Teletrial Model was developed to bring clinical trials “closer to home”. In 2020, the Australian Teletrial Program was funded to expand and support the uptake of the model across six Australian states and territories. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the clinical trial landscape in Australia prior to the implementation of the Australian Teletrial Program with a particular focus on rural, regional and remote health services. Methods This qualitative study provides a descriptive exploration of the clinical trial landscape across rural, regional and remote Australia. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews ( n  = 33) and one focus group ( n  = 5) involving clinical trial stakeholders between August 2022 and May 2023. Deductive then inductive thematic analysis used the broad topic areas of the interview schedule as a framework, as follows: education and training, workforce, equipment and services, clinical trial sites, participant recruitment and clinical trial approval process. Results This study identified barriers that are generalizable to the Australian clinical trial landscape and those specific to the rural, regional and remote health service context. The main barriers to conducting clinical trials in rural, regional and remote areas were lack of investment and engagement on the part of health service executives, workforce limitations, inconsistent training, lack of physical infrastructure and competing clinical priorities. Despite these challenges, clinicians reported enthusiasm for conducting clinical trials, and opportunities were reported for these health services to partner with larger metropolitan/regional health services, regional universities and communities to support the growth of clinical trial capability and capacity. Conclusions The clinical trial landscape in Australian health services varies in terms of quality and availability of training, workforce capacity, executive support, site capability and approval processes. The Australian Teletrial Program has an immense opportunity to overcome some of the reported challenges by supporting capacity and capability building. Ultimately, however, sustainable reform to bring trials closer to home requires a collaborative approach that considers implementation strategies across all levels of the health service and government, alongside other initiatives.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Australia / Capacity building approach / Clinical research / Clinical trials / Clinical Trials as Topic / Collaborative approach / Evidence-based medicine / Executives / Focus Groups / Government finance / Health Administration / Health disparities / Health initiatives / Health Policy / Health services / Health Services Accessibility / Health Services Research / Hospitals / Humans / Inequality / Infrastructure / Interviews / Interviews as Topic / Jurisdiction / Landscape / Medical care / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Oncology / Patient Selection / Professionals / Public Health / Public policy / Qualitative Research / Quality management / R & D/Technology Policy / Recruitment / Regions / Remote areas / Researchers / Rural areas / Rural communities / Rural Health Services - organization & administration / Rural Population / Rural populations / Rural, regional and remote health / Stakeholders / Teletrials / Training / Uptake / Workforce