Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales
Do you wish to request the book?
A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A scoping review and mapping exercise comparing the content of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across heart disease-specific scales
2020
Overview
Background
Over the past decade, the importance of person-centered care has led to increased interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In cardiovascular care, selecting an appropriate PROM for clinical use or research is challenging because multimorbidity is often common in patients. The aim was therefore to provide an overview of heart-disease specific PROMs and to compare the content of those outcomes using a bio-psycho-social framework of health.
Methods
A scoping review of heart disease-specific PROMs, including arrhythmia/atrial fibrillation, congenital heart disease, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and valve diseases was conducted in PubMed (January 2018). All items contained in the disease-specific PROMs were mapped to WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) according to standardized linking rules.
Results
A total of 34 PROMs (heart diseases in general
n
= 5; cardiac arrhythmia
n
= 6; heart failure
n
= 14; ischemic heart disease
n
= 9) and 147 ICF categories were identified. ICF categories covered
Body functions
(
n
= 61),
Activities & Participation
(
n
= 69), and
Environmental factors
(
n
= 17). Most items were about experienced problems of
Body functions
and less often about patients’ daily activities, and most PROMs were specifically developed for heart failure and no PROM were identified for valve disease or congenital heart disease.
Conclusions
Our results motivate and provide information to develop comprehensive PROMs that consider activity and participation by patients with various types of heart disease.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V,SpringerOpen
Subject
/ Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa och socialmedicin
/ Healthcare quality, Patient outcome assessment
/ International Classification of Functioning
/ International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
/ Medicine
/ Nursing
/ Patient-reported outcome measures
/ Patients
/ Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
/ Review
