Journal Article

Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism

Whitton, Felix, Richman, Nadia I., Collen, Ben, Pollock, Caroline, Soulsby, Anne-Marie, Baillie, Jonathan E. M., Dyer, Ellie E., Böhm, Monika, Darwall, William R. T., Cumberlidge, Neil

2014

Overview

AIM: Global‐scale studies are required to identify broad‐scale patterns in the distributions of species, to evaluate the processes that determine diversity and to determine how similar or different these patterns and processes are among different groups of freshwater species. Broad‐scale patterns of spatial variation in species distribution are central to many fundamental questions in macroecology and conservation biology. We aimed to evaluate how congruent three commonly used metrics of diversity were among taxa for six groups of freshwater species. LOCATION: Global. METHODS: We compiled geographical range data on 7083 freshwater species of mammals, amphibians, reptiles, fishes, crabs and crayfish to evaluate how species richness, richness of threatened species and endemism are distributed across freshwater ecosystems. We evaluated how congruent these measures of diversity were among taxa at a global level for a grid cell size of just under 1°. RESULTS: We showed that although the risk of extinction faced by freshwater decapods is quite similar to that of freshwater vertebrates, there is a distinct lack of spatial congruence in geographical range between different taxonomic groups at this spatial scale, and a lack of congruence among three commonly used metrics of biodiversity. The risk of extinction for freshwater species was consistently higher than for their terrestrial counterparts. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that broad‐scale patterns of species richness, threatened‐species richness and endemism lack congruence among the six freshwater taxonomic groups examined. Invertebrate species are seldom taken into account in conservation planning. Our study suggests that both the metric of biodiversity and the identity of the taxa on which conservation decisions are based require careful consideration. As geographical range information becomes available for further sets of species, further testing will be warranted into the extent to which geographical variation in the richness of these six freshwater groups reflects broader patterns of biodiversity in fresh water.

• Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd,John Wiley & Sons Ltd,Blackwell,Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subject: Amphibians / Animal and plant ecology / Animal, plant and microbial ecology / Biodiversity / Biodiversity conservation / biogeography / Biological and medical sciences / Cambaridae / Congruence / conservation planning / crabs / crayfish / Crustacea / Decapoda / decapods / diversity metric / ecosystems / Extinct species / extinction / fish / Fresh water / Fresh water ecosystems / Freshwater / Freshwater organisms / Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology / General aspects / geographical range / geographical variation / interspecific variation / Invertebrates / mammals / planning / reptiles / Research Papers / risk / species differences / Species diversity / species richness / Synecology / Taxa / Threatened species / Wildlife conservation