Journal Article

Improving management of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer using comprehensive medical assessment: a pilot study

Signal, Louise, Sarfati, Diana, Signal, Virginia, Jackson, Christopher, McLaughlin, Marie, Hardie, Claire, Steele, Courtney, Holst, Kirsten

2020

Overview

Background Screening for and active management of comorbidity soon after cancer diagnosis shows promise in altering cancer treatment and outcomes for comorbid patients. Prior to a large multi-centre study, piloting of the intervention (comprehensive medical assessment) was undertaken to investigate the feasibility of the comorbidity screening tools and proposed outcome measures, and the feasibility, acceptability and potential effect of the intervention. Methods In this pilot intervention study, 72 patients of all ages (36 observation/36 intervention) with newly diagnosed or recently relapsed colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled and underwent comorbidity screening and risk stratification. Intervention patients meeting pre-specified comorbidity criteria were referred for intervention, a comprehensive medical assessment carried out by geriatricians. Each intervention was individually tailored but included assessment and management of comorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health particularly depression, functional status and psychosocial issues. Recruitment and referral to intervention were tracked, verbal and written feedback were gathered from staff, and semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 patients to assess screening tool and intervention feasibility and acceptability. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Patients were followed for 6–12 months after recruitment to assess feasibility of proposed outcome measures (chemotherapy uptake and completion rates, grade 3–5 treatment toxicity, attendance at hospital emergency clinic, and unplanned hospitalisations) and descriptive data on outcomes collated. Results Of the 29 intervention patients eligible for the intervention, 21 received it with feedback indicating that the intervention was acceptable. Those in the intervention group were less likely to be on 3+ medications, to have been admitted to hospital in previous 12 months, or to have limitations in daily activities. Collection of data to measure proposed outcomes was feasible with 55% (6/11) of intervention patients completing chemotherapy as planned compared to none (of 14) of the control group. No differences were seen in other outcome measures. Overall the study was feasible with modification, but the intervention was difficult to integrate into clinical pathways. C onclusions This study generated valuable results that will be used to guide modification of the study and its approaches prior to progressing to a larger-scale study. Trial registration Retrospective, 26 August 2019, ACTRN12619001192178 .

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adenocarcinoma / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Cancer diagnosis / Cancer patients / Cancer Research / Cancer therapies / Cancer treatment / Care and treatment / Chemotherapy / Chemotherapy tolerance / Clinical trials / Colorectal cancer / Colorectal carcinoma / Comorbid patients / Comorbidity / Data collection / Depression (Mood disorder) / Epidemiology / Feedback / Geriatrics / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Health services / Hypothesis testing / Intervention / Interventions / Medical examination / Medical research / Medicine/Public Health / Neoplasms / Oncology / Patient outcomes / Patients / Polypharmacy / prevention and public health / Quality control / Quality improvement / Quality management / Quality of life / Research Article / Studies / Surgical Oncology / Toxicity