Journal Article

Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review

Schmidt, M. K., Engelhardt, E. G., Schats, W., Binuya, M. A. E., Steyerberg, E. W.

2022

Overview

Background Clinical prediction models are often not evaluated properly in specific settings or updated, for instance, with information from new markers. These key steps are needed such that models are fit for purpose and remain relevant in the long-term. We aimed to present an overview of methodological guidance for the evaluation (i.e., validation and impact assessment) and updating of clinical prediction models. Methods We systematically searched nine databases from January 2000 to January 2022 for articles in English with methodological recommendations for the post-derivation stages of interest. Qualitative analysis was used to summarize the 70 selected guidance papers. Results Key aspects for validation are the assessment of statistical performance using measures for discrimination (e.g., C-statistic) and calibration (e.g., calibration-in-the-large and calibration slope). For assessing impact or usefulness in clinical decision-making, recent papers advise using decision-analytic measures (e.g., the Net Benefit) over simplistic classification measures that ignore clinical consequences (e.g., accuracy, overall Net Reclassification Index). Commonly recommended methods for model updating are recalibration (i.e., adjustment of intercept or baseline hazard and/or slope), revision (i.e., re-estimation of individual predictor effects), and extension (i.e., addition of new markers). Additional methodological guidance is needed for newer types of updating (e.g., meta-model and dynamic updating) and machine learning-based models. Conclusion Substantial guidance was found for model evaluation and more conventional updating of regression-based models. An important development in model evaluation is the introduction of a decision-analytic framework for assessing clinical usefulness. Consensus is emerging on methods for model updating.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Breast cancer / Calibration / Cardiovascular disease / Clinical decision making / Discrimination / Evaluation / Health Sciences / Humans / Impact assessment / Medical prognosis / Medical research / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Medicine, Experimental / Methods / Model evaluation / Models, Statistical / Outcome and process assessment (Health Care) / Practice guidelines (Medicine) / Prediction model / Prognosis / Research methodology / Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 / Statistical models / Statistical Theory and Methods / Statistics for Life Sciences / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics / Validation