Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evidence-based guideline implementation of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evidence-based guideline implementation of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
Do you wish to request the book?
Evidence-based guideline implementation of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evidence-based guideline implementation of quality assurance and quality control procedures in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey
2017
Overview
Background
The World Mental Health surveys have been known to apply high standards of quality control, but few studies have been published to document this. Furthermore, the effectiveness of quality control has rarely been reported in the Middle East.
Case presentation
The focus of this paper was to highlight the implementation of quality control procedures in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey under the World Mental Health Survey Consortium. The paper summarizes the guidelines implemented for the various phases of survey quality control—the quality assurance procedures, the quality control procedures and the quality control appraisal components—as per previously prescribed recommendations in literature.
Conclusions
Survey quality management is a process and not reducible to a single event. Midstream corrections are warranted by detecting problems and intervening appropriately. The Saudi National Mental Health Survey implemented such procedures through continuous quality improvement.
