Journal Article

Data Access Committees

Cheah, Phaik Yeong, Piasecki, Jan

2020

Overview

Background Sharing de-identified individual-level health research data is widely promoted and has many potential benefits. However there are also some potential harms, such as misuse of data and breach of participant confidentiality. One way to promote the benefits of sharing while ameliorating its potential harms is through the adoption of a managed access approach where data requests are channeled through a Data Access Committee (DAC), rather than making data openly available without restrictions. A DAC, whether a formal or informal group of individuals, has the responsibility of reviewing and assessing data access requests. Many individual groups, consortiums, institutional and independent DACs have been established but there is currently no widely accepted framework for their organization and function. Main text We propose that DACs, should have the role of both promotion of data sharing and protection of data subjects, their communities, data producers, their institutions and the scientific enterprise. We suggest that data access should be granted by DACs as long as the data reuse has potential social value and provided there is low risk of foreseeable harms. To promote data sharing and to motivate data producers, DACs should encourage secondary uses that are consistent with the interests of data producers and their own institutions. Given the suggested roles of DACs, there should be transparent, simple and clear application procedures for data access. The approach to review of applications should be proportionate to the potential risks involved. DACs should be established within institutional and legal frameworks with clear lines of accountability, terms of reference and membership. We suggest that DACs should not be modelled after research ethics committees (RECs) because their functions and goals of review are different from those of RECs. DAC reviews should be guided by the principles of public health ethics instead of research ethics. Conclusions In this paper we have suggested a framework under which DACs should operate, how they should be organised, and how to constitute them.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Access to Information - ethics / Accountability / Accounting departments / Confidential communications / Confidentiality - ethics / Consortia / Data Access Committee / Data integrity / Data sharing / Debate / Education / Ethical aspects / Ethics / Ethics Committees, Research - organization & administration / Ethics in Biomedical Research / Ethics, Research / Health care policy / Humans / Information Dissemination - ethics / Information sharing / Medical ethics / Medical records / Medical research / Philosophy / Philosophy of Medicine / Public health / Public health movements / Research ethics / Research ethics committees / Researchers / Retirement benefits / Social Responsibility / Theory of Medicine/Bioethics