Journal Article

Reasons for non-attendance to cervical cancer screening and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among Bruneian women: A cross-sectional study

Lim, Edwin, Chaw, Liling, Lee, Shirley H. F., Ja’afar, Nurul Iffah Hazwani, Sharbawi, Roslin

2022

Overview

Uptake for cervical cancer screening remains well below the 80% target as recommended by Brunei's National Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control plan. We conducted a pilot study to determine the reasons for non-attendance and explore their acceptance of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as an alternative to the Pap test. A cross-sectional study was conducted at a primary healthcare center in Brunei, from January to December 2019. We recruited screening non-attendees, defined as women who were eligible for Pap test but who either never, or did not have one within the recommended screening interval of 3 years. This recruitment was done conveniently among women attending outpatient care and/or child health services at the primary healthcare center. Participants were first asked to complete a self-administered paper-based questionnaire on their reasons for screening non-attendance, and then invited for HPV self-sampling. Among those who agreed to participate in HPV self-sampling, they were asked to complete a second questionnaire on the self-sampling procedure and their samples were tested for high-risk HPV (hr-HPV). Results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. We enrolled 174 screening non-attendees, out of which 97 (55.7%) also participated in HPV self-sampling. The main reasons for not attending Pap test screening were fear of bad results (16.1%, n = 28); embarrassment (14.9%, n = 26) and lack of time due to home commitments (10.3%, n = 18). When compared to those who agreed to participate in HPV self-sampling, those who declined were significantly older (p = 0.002) and less likely to agree that they are susceptible to cervical cancer (p = 0.023). They preferred to receive Pap test-related information from healthcare workers (59.0%, n = 155), social messaging platforms (28.7%, n = 51) and social media (26.4%, n = 47). HPV self-sampling kits were positively received among the 97 participants, where > 90% agreed on its ease and convenience. Nine (9.3%) tested positive for hr-HPV, out of which eight were non-16/18 HPV genotypes. Our findings suggest that promoting awareness on cervical cancer, clarifying any misconceptions of Pap test results, and highlighting that the disease is preventable and that early detection through screening can facilitate successful treatment would help increase screening uptake among Bruneian non-attendees. Response to HPV self-sampling was highly positive, suggesting the possibility of implementing this strategy in the local setting. Our high detection of non-16/18 HPV genotypes suggest high prevalence of other hr-HPV genotypes in Brunei. Larger studies should be conducted to further validate our findings.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Alphapapillomavirus / Analysis / Biology and life sciences / Brunei / Cancer / Cancer screening / Care and treatment / Cellular biology / Cervical cancer / Cervix / Child / Cross-Sectional Studies / Diagnosis / Early Detection of Cancer - methods / Female / Genotypes / Health aspects / Health care / Health sciences / Health services / Human papillomavirus / Humans / Likert scale / Mass Screening - methods / Medical personnel / Medical screening / Medicine and Health Sciences / Pap smear / Pap test / Papillomaviridae / Papillomavirus Infections - diagnosis / Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control / Papillomaviruses / Patient Acceptance of Health Care / People and Places / Pilot Projects / Population / Questionnaires / Research and Analysis Methods / Risk factors / Sampling / Self Care - methods / Specimen Handling - methods / Statistical methods / Testing / Testing laboratories / Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Women / Womens health