Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Contribution of Host Intracellular Transport Machineries to Intercellular Movement of Turnip Mosaic Virus
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Contribution of Host Intracellular Transport Machineries to Intercellular Movement of Turnip Mosaic Virus
Do you wish to request the book?
Contribution of Host Intracellular Transport Machineries to Intercellular Movement of Turnip Mosaic Virus
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Contribution of Host Intracellular Transport Machineries to Intercellular Movement of Turnip Mosaic Virus
2013
Overview
The contribution of different host cell transport systems in the intercellular movement of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) was investigated. To discriminate between primary infections and secondary infections associated with the virus intercellular movement, a gene cassette expressing GFP-HDEL was inserted adjacent to a TuMV infectious cassette expressing 6K₂:mCherry, both within the T-DNA borders of the binary vector pCambia. In this system, both gene cassettes were delivered to the same cell by a single binary vector and primary infection foci emitted green and red fluorescence while secondarily infected cells emitted only red fluorescence. Intercellular movement was measured at 72 hours post infiltration and was estimated to proceed at an average rate of one cell being infected every three hours over an observation period of 17 hours. To determine if the secretory pathway were important for TuMV intercellular movement, chemical and protein inhibitors that blocked both early and late secretory pathways were used. Treatment with Brefeldin A or Concanamycin A or expression of ARF1 or RAB-E1d dominant negative mutants, all of which inhibit pre- or post-Golgi transport, reduced intercellular movement by the virus. These treatments, however, did not inhibit virus replication in primary infected cells. Pharmacological interference assays using Tyrphostin A23 or Wortmannin showed that endocytosis was not important for TuMV intercellular movement. Lack of co-localization by endocytosed FM4-64 and Ara7 (AtRabF2b) with TuMV-induced 6K₂-tagged vesicles further supported this conclusion. Microfilament depolymerizing drugs and silencing expression of myosin XI-2 gene, but not myosin VIII genes, also inhibited TuMV intercellular movement. Expression of dominant negative myosin mutants confirmed the role played by myosin XI-2 as well as by myosin XI-K in TuMV intercellular movement. Using this dual gene cassette expression system and transport inhibitors, components of the secretory and actomyosin machinery were shown to be important for TuMV intercellular spread.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Actin Cytoskeleton - metabolism
/ ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1 - metabolism
/ Androstadienes - pharmacology
/ Antifungal Agents - pharmacology
/ Antiviral Agents - pharmacology
/ Biological Transport, Active - drug effects
/ Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology
/ Genes
/ Leaves
/ Proteins
/ Turnips
/ Virus Replication - drug effects
/ Virus Replication - physiology
/ Viruses
