Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities
by
Gastmans, Chris
, Gómez-Vírseda, Carlos
, de Maeseneer, Yves
in
Advance directives
/ Clinical medicine
/ Communitarianism
/ Debate
/ Decision making
/ Education
/ End-of-life
/ Ethics
/ Ethics in Clinical Practice
/ Euthanasia
/ Medical ethics
/ Palliative Care
/ Patients
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Relational autonomy
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities
by
Gastmans, Chris
, Gómez-Vírseda, Carlos
, de Maeseneer, Yves
in
Advance directives
/ Clinical medicine
/ Communitarianism
/ Debate
/ Decision making
/ Education
/ End-of-life
/ Ethics
/ Ethics in Clinical Practice
/ Euthanasia
/ Medical ethics
/ Palliative Care
/ Patients
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Relational autonomy
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities
by
Gastmans, Chris
, Gómez-Vírseda, Carlos
, de Maeseneer, Yves
in
Advance directives
/ Clinical medicine
/ Communitarianism
/ Debate
/ Decision making
/ Education
/ End-of-life
/ Ethics
/ Ethics in Clinical Practice
/ Euthanasia
/ Medical ethics
/ Palliative Care
/ Patients
/ Philosophy
/ Philosophy of Medicine
/ Relational autonomy
/ Shared decision making
/ Systematic review
/ Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities
Journal Article
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Respect for autonomy is a paramount principle in end-of-life ethics. Nevertheless, empirical studies show that decision-making, exclusively focused on the individual exercise of autonomy fails to align well with patients’ preferences at the end of life. The need for a more contextualized approach that meets real-life complexities experienced in end-of-life practices has been repeatedly advocated. In this regard, the notion of ‘relational autonomy’ may be a suitable alternative approach. Relational autonomy has even been advanced as a foundational notion of palliative care, shared decision-making, and advance-care planning. However, relational autonomy in end-of-life care is far from being clearly conceptualized or practically operationalized.
Main body
Here, we develop a relational account of autonomy in end-of-life care, one based on a dialogue between lived reality and conceptual thinking. We first show that the complexities of autonomy as experienced by patients and caregivers in end-of-life practices are inadequately acknowledged. Second, we critically reflect on how engaging a notion of relational autonomy can be an adequate answer to addressing these complexities. Our proposal brings into dialogue different ethical perspectives and incorporates multidimensional, socially embedded, scalar, and temporal aspects of relational theories of autonomy. We start our reflection with a case in end-of-life care, which we use as an illustration throughout our analysis.
Conclusion
This article develops a relational account of autonomy, which responds to major shortcomings uncovered in the mainstream interpretation of this principle and which can be applied to end-of-life care practices.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.