Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Biodosimetric analysis of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy by dicentric chromosome aberration assay
by
Agarwal, Nayan
, Singh, Kishore
, Kapoor, Seema
, Jindal, Ankur
, Arora, Savita
, Prabhat, Kumar
, Kaushik, Himanshi
, Rathi, Arun K.
in
Care and treatment
/ Causes of
/ Chromosome abnormalities
/ Chromosomes
/ Complications and side effects
/ Diagnosis
/ Genetic aspects
/ Head & neck cancer
/ Head and neck cancer
/ Inhibitor drugs
/ Lymphocytes
/ Methods
/ Original Article
/ Radiation dosimetry
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy
/ Risk factors
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Biodosimetric analysis of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy by dicentric chromosome aberration assay
by
Agarwal, Nayan
, Singh, Kishore
, Kapoor, Seema
, Jindal, Ankur
, Arora, Savita
, Prabhat, Kumar
, Kaushik, Himanshi
, Rathi, Arun K.
in
Care and treatment
/ Causes of
/ Chromosome abnormalities
/ Chromosomes
/ Complications and side effects
/ Diagnosis
/ Genetic aspects
/ Head & neck cancer
/ Head and neck cancer
/ Inhibitor drugs
/ Lymphocytes
/ Methods
/ Original Article
/ Radiation dosimetry
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy
/ Risk factors
2024
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Biodosimetric analysis of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy by dicentric chromosome aberration assay
by
Agarwal, Nayan
, Singh, Kishore
, Kapoor, Seema
, Jindal, Ankur
, Arora, Savita
, Prabhat, Kumar
, Kaushik, Himanshi
, Rathi, Arun K.
in
Care and treatment
/ Causes of
/ Chromosome abnormalities
/ Chromosomes
/ Complications and side effects
/ Diagnosis
/ Genetic aspects
/ Head & neck cancer
/ Head and neck cancer
/ Inhibitor drugs
/ Lymphocytes
/ Methods
/ Original Article
/ Radiation dosimetry
/ Radiation therapy
/ Radiotherapy
/ Risk factors
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Biodosimetric analysis of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy by dicentric chromosome aberration assay
Journal Article
Biodosimetric analysis of head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy by dicentric chromosome aberration assay
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background:
Biodosimetry is the quantification of absorbed radiation dose using biological material obtained from an exposed individual. Radiation can cause different types of chromosomal aberrations, including stable aberrations like translocations and unstable ones like micronuclei, dicentric chromosomes (DC), acentric, and ring forms. Dicentric chromosome assay has become the \"gold standard\" for cytogenetic biodosimetry due to its reproducibility, specificity (low baseline rates), and sensitivity to low doses. Using existing calibration curves and models obtained from in vitro irradiation of blood, the yield of DCs can be used to estimate the average whole-body absorbed dose.
Purpose:
To evaluate and compare the in vivo dose-response relation of DC aberration formation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) alone, cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CCRT), accelerated fractionation RT (AFRT), and CCRT with gefitinib (GCRT).
Methodology:
This prospective observational and analytical study was conducted from 2018 to 2021 in the Department of Radiation Oncology and Genetic Lab of tertiary care, teaching hospital after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Biodosimetric analysis was done weekly in patients undergoing RT (n = 20) versus CCRT (n = 20), CCRT (n = 12) versus AFRT (n = 12), and CCRT (n = 6) versus GCRT (n = 6). The yield of DCs was measured in blood samples taken before starting treatment, that is, day 0 and during RT on days 6, 11, and 16 in RT alone versus CCRT; on days 7 and 13 in CCRT versus AFRT; and days 6 and 11 in CCRT versus GCRT from a blood sample drawn 1-2 h after RT. Phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes were cultured using heparinized blood in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum. Cells were arrested at metaphase using demecolcine, harvested by centrifugation, mounted, and stained with Giemsa. Cytogenetic analysis was performed by analyzing at least 100 metaphases with well-spread chromosomes. DC aberrations and acentric fragments were identified and recorded. To standardize the findings as per the customized field for every patient, the mean DC yield per cm2 of the irradiated area was calculated and compared.
Results:
The mean yield of DC/cm2 in the CCRT group was greater than the RT alone group by 16.33%, 28.57%, and 18.68% on days 6, 11, and 16 of treatment, respectively. This difference between the two groups at day 6 (P = 0.001), day 11 (P < 0.001), and day 16 (P < 0.001) was found to be statistically significant. The mean yield of DC/cm2 in the CCRT group was greater than the AFRT group by 7.9% and 18.3% on days 7 and 13 of treatment, respectively. This difference at day 7 (P < 0.001) and day 13 (P < 0.001) was found to be statistically significant. The mean yield of DC/cm2 in the CCRT group was greater than the GCRT group by 22.7% and 21.8% on days 6 and 11 of treatment, respectively. The difference at day 6 (P = 0.01) was statistically significant but, on day 11 (P = 0.065) this difference was found insignificant.
Conclusion:
There is a dose-dependent increase in the yield of DCs in lymphocytes of HNC patients undergoing RT with subsequent fractions. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is the superior method of treatment intensification radio-biologically proven by higher DC yield.
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow,Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd,Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.