MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media
Journal Article

LLM-Based Classification and Topic Modeling of Generative AI Ethical Risk Discourse on Social Media

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Identifying sparse, context-dependent target discourse such as ethical risk discourse on generative AI in noisy social media data is a long-standing challenge in computational text analysis. Beyond classification, interpreting the resulting topic structure transparently poses an additional methodological challenge. To address these problems, this study proposes a reproducible two-stage framework. First, four LLMs (GPT-4.1, GPT-3.5-turbo, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 2.5 Pro) are compared on a human-annotated validation set using a zero-shot prompt grounded in five ethical risk categories, and the best-performing model is selected to classify the full keyword-prescreened corpus. Validity is evaluated against human annotations and supervised baselines. Second, BERTopic is applied to the classified corpus, and sub-topics are linked to higher-level categories through an explicit mapping protocol. The study draws on approximately 500,000 ChatGPT-related English-language tweets from January to March 2023. Only 36.4% of the validation sample constituted ethical risk discourse, confirming substantial pre-screening noise. GPT-4.1, selected as the final classification model, achieved the strongest performance (accuracy = 0.899, F1 = 0.859, Cohen’s κ = 0.780), significantly outperforming conventional supervised baselines. BERTopic yielded 33 non-outlier sub-topics; within this subset, Societal and democratic risks (36.16%) and Technical safety (20.90%) were the largest categories. These findings should be interpreted not as a direct measure of users’ risk perceptions in 2023, but as the category distribution within the structured subset excluding outliers, after keyword screening and classification under the current ethical risk taxonomy used in this study. Within this scope, societal and institutional concerns were at least as prominent as those related to technical failures.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks