Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
APPLICABILITY OF DEMIRJIAN AND CHAILLET’S METHODS IN ESTIMATING DENTAL AGE IN CHILDREN FROM THE STATE OF ZULIA, VENEZUELA
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
APPLICABILITY OF DEMIRJIAN AND CHAILLET’S METHODS IN ESTIMATING DENTAL AGE IN CHILDREN FROM THE STATE OF ZULIA, VENEZUELA
Do you wish to request the book?
APPLICABILITY OF DEMIRJIAN AND CHAILLET’S METHODS IN ESTIMATING DENTAL AGE IN CHILDREN FROM THE STATE OF ZULIA, VENEZUELA
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
APPLICABILITY OF DEMIRJIAN AND CHAILLET’S METHODS IN ESTIMATING DENTAL AGE IN CHILDREN FROM THE STATE OF ZULIA, VENEZUELA
2018
Overview
Introduction: dental age (DA) is used in clinical disciplines to assess whether an individual is advanced or delayed in his or her dental development, or to determine the age of living or deceased subjects with no valid identification documents; it is also useful in forensic practice. Objective: to study the applicability of the methods of Demirjian et al (revised, 1976) and Chaillet et al in estimating DA in a sample of Venezuelan children and adolescents. Methods: a descriptive, retrospective field study in 516 panoramic X-rays of patients of both sexes with chronological ages ranging from 6 to 18 years. Dental development was assessed in the seven lower left teeth using the maturation stages proposed in the method of Demirjian et al, while DA calculation was carried out according to the reference tables provided by each method. Descriptive statistics were obtained, as well as mean differences between chronological age (CA) and DA estimated by a Student’s test. Results: there was age overestimation with Demirjian’s method up to the age of 15 years, as well as age underestimation with Chaillet’s method. Considering the total sample, both methods underestimated age (Demirjian 0.20 ± 1.46; Chaillet 0.34 ± 1.39), and the difference between CA and DA was significant (Demirjian p = 0.0002; Chaillet p = 0.000). Conclusions: both methods can be used in the sample studied, considering that DA should be assessed in conjunction with other indicators of maturation to evaluate the development of an individual.
Publisher
Universidad de Antioquia
