Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
by
Saez, Emmanuel
, Turner, Nicholas
, Yagan, Danny
, Friedman, John N
, Chetty, Raj
in
Colleges & universities
/ Economic theory
/ Income distribution
/ Low income groups
/ Students
/ Upward mobility
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
by
Saez, Emmanuel
, Turner, Nicholas
, Yagan, Danny
, Friedman, John N
, Chetty, Raj
in
Colleges & universities
/ Economic theory
/ Income distribution
/ Low income groups
/ Students
/ Upward mobility
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
Paper
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Working Paper No. 23618 We characterize intergenerational income mobility at each college in the United States using data for over 30 million college students from 1999-2013. We document four results. First, access to colleges varies greatly by parent income. For example, children whose parents are in the top 1% of the income distribution are 77 times more likely to attend an Ivy League college than those whose parents are in the bottom income quintile. Second, children from low- and high-income families have similar earnings outcomes conditional on the college they attend, indicating that low-income students are not mismatched at selective colleges. Third, rates of upward mobility - the fraction of students who come from families in the bottom income quintile and reach the top quintile - differ substantially across colleges because low-income access varies significantly across colleges with similar earnings outcomes. Rates of bottom-to-top quintile mobility are highest at certain mid-tier public universities, such as the City University of New York and California State colleges. Rates of upper-tail (bottom quintile to top 1%) mobility are highest at elite colleges, such as Ivy League universities. Fourth, the fraction of students from low-income families did not change substantially between 2000-2011 at elite private colleges, but fell sharply at colleges with the highest rates of bottom-to-top-quintile mobility. Although our descriptive analysis does not identify colleges' causal effects on students' outcomes, the publicly available statistics constructed here highlight colleges that deserve further study as potential engines of upward mobility.
Publisher
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.