Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Using Social Networking Sites During Lockdown: Risks and Benefits/Uso de Redes Sociales Durante el Confinamiento: Riesgos y Beneficios
by
Cuesta, Marcelino
, Kuss, Daria J
, Postigo, Alvaro
, Garcia-Fernandez, Jaime
, Menendez-Aller, Alvaro
, Gonzalez-Nuevo, Covadonga
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Using Social Networking Sites During Lockdown: Risks and Benefits/Uso de Redes Sociales Durante el Confinamiento: Riesgos y Beneficios
by
Cuesta, Marcelino
, Kuss, Daria J
, Postigo, Alvaro
, Garcia-Fernandez, Jaime
, Menendez-Aller, Alvaro
, Gonzalez-Nuevo, Covadonga
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Using Social Networking Sites During Lockdown: Risks and Benefits/Uso de Redes Sociales Durante el Confinamiento: Riesgos y Beneficios
Journal Article
Using Social Networking Sites During Lockdown: Risks and Benefits/Uso de Redes Sociales Durante el Confinamiento: Riesgos y Beneficios
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Previous research about use of Social Networking Sites (SNS) use during the COVID-19 lockdown has examined benefits and risks of SNS use (i.e., support through SNS, problematic SNS use and interaction about COVID-19) without comparing them. This study has two objectives: (i)to evaluate which SNS uses (problematic SNS use and interaction about COVID-19 on SNS) predict increased emotional distress, and (ii) to analyse if social support and interaction about COVID-19 mediated the relationship between time spent on SNS and increased emotional distress. Method: Atotal of 1,003 participants (75.5% women) over 18 years old took part (M = 42.33; SD = 14.32 years). Three hierarchical linear regressions were performed for the first objective and a path analysis was performed for the second. Results: Results showed that negative social comparison on SNS had the highest positive regression weight, followed by interaction about COVID-19 and addictive consequences. Also, an indirect effect of time spent on SNS on anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction through interaction about COVID-19 and support through SNS was found. Conclusions: The results indicate that comparative SNS use is the best predictor of emotional distress. The mediation model proposed was confirmed, highlighting the importance of assessing specific SNS uses. Keywords: Social Networking Sites Anxiety Depression COVID-19 Social support Introducción: Estudios previos durante el confinamiento por COVID-19 sobre el uso de Redes Sociales (RRSS) han examinado los beneficios y riesgos de diferentes usos (uso problemático, interacción sobre el COVID-19 y apoyo mediante RRSS), sin compararlos. Este estudio tiene dos objetivos: a) evaluar qué uso de RRSS predice mejor el incremento de distrés emocional, y b) analizar si el apoyo y la interacción sobre COVID-19 en RRSS media la relación entre el tiempo de uso y el distrés emocional. Método: La muestra constó de 1,003 participantes (75.5% mujeres) mayores de 18 años (M = 42.33; DT = 14.32). Se llevaron a cabo tres regresiones lineales jerárquicas para el primer objetivo y un path análisis para el segundo. Resultados: La comparación social negativa en RRSS tiene el mayor peso de regresión, seguido de interacción sobre el COVID-19 y consecuencias adictivas. Se ha obtenido un efecto indirecto del tiempo de uso sobre el distrés emocional a través de la interacción sobre COVID-19 y el apoyo mediante RRSS. Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que el uso comparativo de RRSS es el mejor predictor de distrés emocional. Se ha confirmado el modelo de mediación, enfatizando la importancia de la evaluación de usos específicos de RRSS. Palabras clave: Redes Sociales Ansiedad Depresión COVID-19 Apoyo social
Publisher
Colegio Oficial De Psicologos Del Principado De Asturias
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.