Journal Article

Distorted Choice in Corporate Bankruptcy

SKEEL, DAVID A.

2020

Overview

We ordinarily assume that a central objective of every voting process is ensuring an undistorted vote. Recent developments in corporate bankruptcy, which culminates with an elaborate vote, are quite puzzling from this perspective. Two strategies now routinely used in big cases are intended to distort, and clearly do distort, the voting process. Restructuring support agreements (RSAs) and \"deathtrap\" provisions remove creditors' ability to vote for or against a proposed reorganization simply on the merits. This Article offers the first comprehensive analysis of these new distortive techniques. One possible solution is simply to ban distortive techniques, as several scholars advocate with RSAs that offer joinder bonuses. Although an antidistortion rule would be straightforward to implement, I argue this would be a mistake. The distortive techniques respond to developments that have made reorganization difficult, such as claims trading and a greater need for speed. Further, Chapter 11's baseline was never intended to be neutral: it nudges the parties toward confirming a reorganization plan. There also are independent justifications for some distortive techniques, and the alternative to using them might be even worse – possibly leading to more fire sales of debtors' assets. How can legitimate use of the new distortive techniques be distinguished from more pernicious practices? To answer this question, I outline four rules of thumb to assist the scrutiny. Courts should consider whether holdouts are a serious threat, the magnitude of the coercion, the significance of any independent justifications, and whether the holdout threat is an intentional feature of the parties' contracts. I then apply the rules of thumb to a few prominent recent cases. I conclude by considering two obvious extensions of the analysis, so-called \"gifting\" transactions in Chapter 11 and bond-exchange offers outside of bankruptcy.

• Publisher: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc,Yale University, School of Law,Yale Law Journal Company, Inc
• Subject: BANKRUPTCY / Choice (Psychology) / Coal mines and mining / CONTRACTS / Corporate governance / Corporation law / Corporations / CORPORATIONS LAW / CREDITORS / Debtor and creditor / DEBTS AND DEBTORS / Economic aspects / Elections / Finance / Law and legislation / MINES AND MINERALS / Reorganization / Voting / Voting machines