Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography versus electrodiagnosis in ulnar neuropathy
by
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
, Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
, Loni, Elham
, Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
, Kargozar, Elham
in
Comparative analysis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Ultrasound imaging
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography versus electrodiagnosis in ulnar neuropathy
by
Rahimi-Dehgolan, Shahram
, Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
, Loni, Elham
, Raeissadat, Seyed Ahmad
, Kargozar, Elham
in
Comparative analysis
/ Diagnostic imaging
/ Ultrasound imaging
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography versus electrodiagnosis in ulnar neuropathy
Journal Article
Diagnostic value of ultrasonography versus electrodiagnosis in ulnar neuropathy
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose: Ulnar neuropathy at elbow is the second-most common compression neuropathy. The main aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of ultrasonography (US) as an alternative method to electrodiagnosis (EDX), which had traditionally been used as the method of choice. Methods: This diagnostic study was conducted on 66 participants (32 patients' elbows and 34 normal elbows) referred for EDX. Both groups were reassessed by US to evaluate the consistency of the two tests. The quantitative parameters of US, such as cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at three different levels around the medial epicondyle (ME) were compared between groups. Results: Our findings demonstrated that CSA at the ME and 2 cm distal to the ME were significantly larger in the patient group than normal participants. This higher nerve size was more prominent among those who had predominant axonal loss rather than demyelinating lesions (P<0.01). Finally, we evaluated US diagnostic value with the best singular feature (2 cm distal to ME) at a cutoff of 9 [mm.sup.2], which revealed specificity of 80% and sensitivity 84%. Conclusion: Based on these results we can conclude that US is a sensitive and specific method in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow and can be used as an acceptable complementary method, in particular when EDX is not available. Keywords: Cubital Tunnel Syndrome, elbow, diagnostic tests, nerve compression syndromes, electromyography
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Limited
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.