Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Inferences Drawn from a Risk Assessment Compared Directly with a Randomized Trial of a Home Drinking Water Intervention
by
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg
, Colford, John M.
, Sylvester, Matthew D.
, LeChevallier, Mark W.
, Hubbard, Alan
, Levy, Deborah A.
, Wade, Timothy J.
in
Algorithms
/ Animals
/ Clinical trials
/ Cryptosporidium
/ Disinfection
/ Drinking water
/ Environmental protection
/ Filtration
/ Giardia
/ Health aspects
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Infection - epidemiology
/ Iowa - epidemiology
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Models, Biological
/ Risk Assessment
/ Viruses
/ Water Microbiology
/ Water Supply - analysis
/ Water treatment
/ Waterborne diseases
2006
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Inferences Drawn from a Risk Assessment Compared Directly with a Randomized Trial of a Home Drinking Water Intervention
by
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg
, Colford, John M.
, Sylvester, Matthew D.
, LeChevallier, Mark W.
, Hubbard, Alan
, Levy, Deborah A.
, Wade, Timothy J.
in
Algorithms
/ Animals
/ Clinical trials
/ Cryptosporidium
/ Disinfection
/ Drinking water
/ Environmental protection
/ Filtration
/ Giardia
/ Health aspects
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Infection - epidemiology
/ Iowa - epidemiology
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Models, Biological
/ Risk Assessment
/ Viruses
/ Water Microbiology
/ Water Supply - analysis
/ Water treatment
/ Waterborne diseases
2006
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Inferences Drawn from a Risk Assessment Compared Directly with a Randomized Trial of a Home Drinking Water Intervention
by
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg
, Colford, John M.
, Sylvester, Matthew D.
, LeChevallier, Mark W.
, Hubbard, Alan
, Levy, Deborah A.
, Wade, Timothy J.
in
Algorithms
/ Animals
/ Clinical trials
/ Cryptosporidium
/ Disinfection
/ Drinking water
/ Environmental protection
/ Filtration
/ Giardia
/ Health aspects
/ Health risks
/ Humans
/ Infection - epidemiology
/ Iowa - epidemiology
/ Medical research
/ Medicine, Experimental
/ Models, Biological
/ Risk Assessment
/ Viruses
/ Water Microbiology
/ Water Supply - analysis
/ Water treatment
/ Waterborne diseases
2006
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Inferences Drawn from a Risk Assessment Compared Directly with a Randomized Trial of a Home Drinking Water Intervention
Journal Article
Inferences Drawn from a Risk Assessment Compared Directly with a Randomized Trial of a Home Drinking Water Intervention
2006
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Risk assessments and intervention trials have been used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to estimate drinking water health risks. Seldom are both methods used concurrently. Between 2001 and 2003, illness data from a trial were collected simultaneously with exposure data, providing a unique opportunity to compare direct risk estimates of waterborne disease from the intervention trial with indirect estimates from a risk assessment. Comparing the group with water treatment (active) with that without water treatment (sham), the estimated annual attributable disease rate (cases per 10,000 persons per year) from the trial provided no evidence of a significantly elevated drinking water risk [attributable risk = -365 cases/year, sham minus active; 95% confidence interval (CI), -2,555 to 1,825]. The predicted mean rate of disease per 10,000 persons per person-year from the risk assessment was 13.9 (2.5, 97.5 percentiles: 1.6, 37.7) assuming 4 log removal due to viral disinfection and 5.5 (2.5, 97.5 percentiles: 1.4, 19.2) assuming 6 log removal. Risk assessments are important under conditions of low risk when estimates are difficult to attain from trials. In particular, this assessment pointed toward the importance of attaining site-specific treatment data and the clear need for a better understanding of viral removal by disinfection. Trials provide direct risk estimates, and the upper confidence limit estimates, even if not statistically significant, are informative about possible upper estimates of likely risk. These differences suggest that conclusions about waterborne disease risk may be strengthened by the joint use of these two approaches.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.