MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring
Dissertation

Tradition and innovation in writing assessment: A comparison of scaled -scoring and Forced -Choice Scoring

2008
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Writing assessment has a long and contentious history in the United States. The debate has centered on issues of reliability and validity of direct and indirect measures of writing achievement. A historical review of direct writing assessment from its origin at Harvard shows the absence of protocols that identify changes in the writing achievement of writers over time. The need for such a protocol was seen as a result of a program evaluation of a professional development program focused on the teaching of writing in upper elementary and middle schools. A corpus of 400 pre- and post-papers from 200 writers was evaluated using two methods. The first used traditional scaled-scoring procedures. Every paper was scored both holistically and on six analytic traits by trained scorers. The results of these scaled-scorings were used to calculate changes in the writing achievement. The second protocol, called Forced-Choice Scoring and introduced in this report, requires readers to compare the pre- and post-writing samples to each other and judge the differences between them both holistically and with six analytical traits. The differences are ranked as \"slightly,\" \"moderately,\" or \"significantly\" better. Comparison of the data generated by these two scoring protocols reveals equivalent numbers of writers demonstrating improvement between the pre- and post-writing samples. However, a detailed analysis of these numbers shows a more complicated picture. The protocols identified the changes in writing achievement the same way for writers only approximately 40% of the time. These differences point out the need to develop an array of writing assessment protocols and the importance of matching the assessment to the goals of the evaluation. Further, this study indicates a striking need too develop a map of writing development across the lifespan.