Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effects of experimental invasive communities on forest dynamics
by
Galbraith-Kent, Shannon Lee
in
Ecology
2008
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effects of experimental invasive communities on forest dynamics
by
Galbraith-Kent, Shannon Lee
in
Ecology
2008
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effects of experimental invasive communities on forest dynamics
Dissertation
Effects of experimental invasive communities on forest dynamics
2008
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Alien invasive plant species have altered the historical descriptions of eastern U.S. forests. This dissertation used an invasive tree ( Acer platanoides) and shrub species (Berberis thunbergii ) to examine how experimental understory communities affected dynamics in a suburban deciduous forest in Central New Jersey, USA. With invasive plant removal often an unrealistic option, these community treatments (0%, 25%, 50% invasive) served as proxies for possible management outcomes to test invasive effects on native species. After only 3 growing seasons, both an A. platanoides canopy and A. platanoides saplings had strong negative impacts on native sapling and seedling growth. There was such a strong negative effect of the invasive canopy on native sapling growth that the presence of invasive saplings was less important. However, beneath a native canopy, native saplings grew significantly more in the absence of invasive saplings. Even if invasive removal in the understory were only done every 2-3 yrs, this would give native saplings release from invasive competition and time to increase in growth (Chapter 1). In two separate experiments, an invasive canopy negatively affected native seedling growth in the forest (Chapter 3), and soil collected from beneath an invasive canopy reduced native growth (greenhouse, Chapter 2). While the understory and canopy types impacted native saplings and seedlings, A. platanoides was largely unaffected (Chapters 1, 3). However, it does appear that it has the ability to shift resource allocation depending on soil type, which may give it a growth advantage over native species (Chapter 2). I did not find support of the ERH, as leaves from seedlings of A. platanoides and A. rubrum had equivalent amounts of herbivory (Chapter 3). In a litter decomposition experiment (Chapter 4), two invasive species had lower C:N ratios than the native species. Higher nitrogen content in invasive litter could alter soil nutrients and cycling and, perhaps, leave a legacy of invasive impact. Experimental studies done in the field can help us increase our understanding of invasive and native species interactions, while providing us with information to guide restoration and management decisions to retain native diversity.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.