Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Best Paper You'll Read Today: Media Biases and the Public Understanding of Science
by
Mohseni, Aydin
, O'Connor, Cailin
, Weatherall, James Owen
in
Journalistic ethics
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Best Paper You'll Read Today: Media Biases and the Public Understanding of Science
by
Mohseni, Aydin
, O'Connor, Cailin
, Weatherall, James Owen
in
Journalistic ethics
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Best Paper You'll Read Today: Media Biases and the Public Understanding of Science
Journal Article
The Best Paper You'll Read Today: Media Biases and the Public Understanding of Science
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Scientific curation, where scientific evidence is selected and shared, is essential to public belief formation about science. Yet common curation practices can distort the body of evidence the public sees. Focusing on science journalism, we employ computational models to investigate how such distortions influence public belief. We consider these effects for agents with and without confirmation bias. We find that standard journalistic practices can lead to significant distortions in public belief; that preexisting errors in public belief can drive further distortions in reporting; that practices that appear relatively unobjectionable can produce serious epistemic harm; and that, in some cases, common curation practices related to fairness and extreme reporting can lead to polarization.
Publisher
University of Arkansas Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.