Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
by
Turner, Erick H.
, Smit, Filip
, Koole, Sander L.
, van Dijke, Annemiek
, Cuijpers, Pim
in
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
/ clinical relevance
/ Combined Modality Therapy
/ depression
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
/ effect size
/ Humans
/ Knee
/ minimal important difference
/ Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
/ Psychometrics
/ Psychotherapy
/ Sports injuries
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
by
Turner, Erick H.
, Smit, Filip
, Koole, Sander L.
, van Dijke, Annemiek
, Cuijpers, Pim
in
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
/ clinical relevance
/ Combined Modality Therapy
/ depression
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
/ effect size
/ Humans
/ Knee
/ minimal important difference
/ Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
/ Psychometrics
/ Psychotherapy
/ Sports injuries
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
by
Turner, Erick H.
, Smit, Filip
, Koole, Sander L.
, van Dijke, Annemiek
, Cuijpers, Pim
in
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
/ clinical relevance
/ Combined Modality Therapy
/ depression
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology
/ Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
/ effect size
/ Humans
/ Knee
/ minimal important difference
/ Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
/ Psychometrics
/ Psychotherapy
/ Sports injuries
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
Journal Article
WHAT IS THE THRESHOLD FOR A CLINICALLY RELEVANT EFFECT? THE CASE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Randomized trials can show whether a treatment effect is statistically significant and can describe the size of the effect. There are, however, no validated methods available for establishing the clinical relevance of these outcomes. Recently, it was proposed that a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.50 be used as cutoff for clinical relevance in the treatment of depression. Methods We explore what the effect size means and why the size of an effect has little bearing on its clinical relevance. We will also examine how the “minimally important difference,” as seen from the patient perspective, may be helpful in deciding where the cutoff for clinical relevance should be placed for a given condition. Results Effect sizes in itself cannot give an indication of the clinical relevance of an intervention because the outcome itself determines the clinical relevance and not only the size of the effects. The “minimal important difference” (MID) could be used as a starting point for pinpointing the cutoff for clinical relevance. A first, rough attempt to implement this approach for depression resulted in a tentative clinical relevance cutoff of SMD = 0.24. Using this cutoff, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and combined treatment have effect sizes above this cutoff. Discussion Statistical outcomes cannot be equated with clinical relevance. The “MID” may be used for pinpointing the cutoff for clinical relevance, but more work in this area is needed.
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd,John Wiley & Sons, Inc
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.