Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982)
by
Bennett, Laurie
in
Easements
/ Environmental law
/ Injunctions
/ Landowners
/ Legislation
/ RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
/ Solar collectors
/ Solar energy
/ Spite fences
/ Sunlight
/ United States Supreme Court doctrines
1983
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982)
by
Bennett, Laurie
in
Easements
/ Environmental law
/ Injunctions
/ Landowners
/ Legislation
/ RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
/ Solar collectors
/ Solar energy
/ Spite fences
/ Sunlight
/ United States Supreme Court doctrines
1983
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Prah v. Maretti, 108 Wis. 2d 223, 321 N.W.2d 182 (1982)
1983
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In Prah v. Maretti, the Wisconsin Supreme Court extended the protection of the nuisance doctrine to owners of solar collectors whose sunlight is blocked by neighboring structures. Meanwhile, the Wisconsin Legislature enacted solar access legislation, providing statutory remedies. This Recent Development examines the Wisconsin court's departure from traditional nuisance doctrine and the decision's probable interaction—or interference—with the new legislation.
Publisher
The Lewis and Clark Law School
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.