Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
WHAT IS A RESTRAINT OF TRADE?
by
Booysen, Sandra
in
Appellate courts
/ Business planning
/ Common law
/ Judgments
/ Jurisdiction
/ Special Feature: The Online Citizen v Attorney-General
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
WHAT IS A RESTRAINT OF TRADE?
by
Booysen, Sandra
in
Appellate courts
/ Business planning
/ Common law
/ Judgments
/ Jurisdiction
/ Special Feature: The Online Citizen v Attorney-General
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
WHAT IS A RESTRAINT OF TRADE?
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The appropriate test for identifying a restraint of trade has long troubled the courts. In Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores, the United Kingdom (“UK”) Supreme Court overruled a decision of the House of Lords that had stood for more than fifty years and adopted the ‘trading society’ test which had been put forward in a minority judgment of the House of Lords decision. Not long after this notable development, in Quantum Actuarial v Quantum Advisory, the English Court of Appeal found that the trading society test was not comprehensive as it could not apply to novel or unique provisions. The trading society test is also open to criticism for being vague and unhelpful. It is, however, supported here for its broad perspective, flexibility and synergy with the competing policies at stake: freedom to contract and freedom to trade.
Publisher
National University of Singapore,National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.