MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study
Journal Article

Oncological outcome of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy versus conventional open mastectomy in early breast cancer: a multicenter cohort study

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In recent years, endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (ENM) has been applied in breast cancer treatment, whereas conventional open mastectomy (COM) remains widely adopted in clinical practice. The data about the oncological outcomes of ENM vs. COM was rare, especially the multicenter data. This multicenter retrospective cohort study enrolled 2,314 early breast cancer patients diagnosed with stage 0-III, and treated with either ENM or COM from September 1st, 2021 to January 30th, 2025 at three institutions. After exclusions, the final cohort consisted of 1,722 patients, of whom 136 were in the ENM group and 1,586 in the conventional group. Demographic data, clinicopathological features, and oncological outcomes were collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias and balance confounders. Before PSM, the patients in ENM group were significant different from COM group in age, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, HER2 status and molecular subtypes. After PSM, the final analysis cohort comprised 136 patients in the ENM group and 408 patients in the COM group. The median follow-up time was 22 months. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in any of the oncological outcome parameters: local recurrence-free survival between COM and ENM groups (97.8% vs. 97.8%; HR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.14-2.90; P = 0.50); regional recurrence-free survival between COM and ENM groups (98.8% vs. 99.3%; HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.17-9.22; P = 0.84); distant metastasis-free survival between COM and ENM groups(97.3% vs. 98.5%; HR, 1.70; 95%CI, 0.47-6.11; P = 0.48); disease free survival between COM and ENM groups(94.9% vs. 96.3%; HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 0.50-3.10; P = 0.66); overall survival between COM and ENM groups(99.3% vs. 99.3%; HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.07-8.72; P = 0.81). In this multicenter cohort study, ENM group showed no different oncological outcomes from COM group. ENM could be used as a viable alternative to COM for eligible breast cancer patients.

MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks