Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
ABORTION ACCESS IN AN ERA OF CONSTITUTIONAL INFIDELITY
by
Bridges, Khiara M
in
Abortion
/ Constitutional law
/ Judicial reviews
/ Women
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
ABORTION ACCESS IN AN ERA OF CONSTITUTIONAL INFIDELITY
by
Bridges, Khiara M
in
Abortion
/ Constitutional law
/ Judicial reviews
/ Women
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
ABORTION ACCESS IN AN ERA OF CONSTITUTIONAL INFIDELITY
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Perhaps the difference between the example of animal slaughter and the issue of abortion is that, while advocates of animal rights might admit that there is some ambiguity to their claim as compared to the claim of religious observers, advocates of fetal rights tend to express absolute conviction that fetal interests should in most, if not all, cases trump the interests of women bearing unwanted pregnancies. [...]the reverse is true of advocates of women's reproductive rights. [...]the likelihood that opponents and supporters of abortion would agree to a \"middle ground\" -- in which there is a rule prohibiting abortion, but exemptions are allowed for individual women who make convincing arguments about their need to have their normative convictions honored -- is low.
Publisher
Boston University School of Law
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.