MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)
Journal Article

Probabilistic Fire Danger Forecasting: A Framework for Week-Two Forecasts Using Statistical Postprocessing Techniques and the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast System (GEFF)

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Wildfire guidance two weeks ahead is needed for strategic planning of fire mitigation and suppression. However, fire forecasts driven by meteorological forecasts from numerical weather prediction models inherently suffer from systematic biases. This study uses several statistical-postprocessing methods to correct these biases and increase the skill of ensemble fire forecasts over the contiguous United States 8–14 days ahead. We train and validate the postprocessing models on 20 years of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reforecasts and ERA5 reanalysis data for 11 meteorological variables related to fire, such as surface temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, cloud cover, and precipitation. The calibrated variables are then input to the Global ECMWF Fire Forecast (GEFF) system to produce probabilistic forecasts of daily fire indicators, which characterize the relationships between fuels, weather, and topography. Skill scores show that the postprocessed forecasts overall have greater positive skill at days 8–14 relative to raw and climatological forecasts. It is shown that the postprocessed forecasts are more reliable at predicting above- and below-normal probabilities of various fire indicators than the raw forecasts and that the greatest skill for days 8–14 is achieved by aggregating forecast days together.