Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The State Commission for Prevention of Corruption as a Preventive Anti-Corruption Agency in Macedonia
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The State Commission for Prevention of Corruption as a Preventive Anti-Corruption Agency in Macedonia
Do you wish to request the book?
The State Commission for Prevention of Corruption as a Preventive Anti-Corruption Agency in Macedonia
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The State Commission for Prevention of Corruption as a Preventive Anti-Corruption Agency in Macedonia
2018
Overview
This paper deals with the core preventive Anti-corruption Agency (ACA) of the Republic of Macedonia, namely the State Commission for Prevention of Corruption (SCPC). The idea therein is two-fold: firstly, to explain the ACA model which the Republic of Macedonia has chosen and, secondly, to criticize some of the characteristics of the respective legal and institutional framework. Of course, we do not aim to analyze every aspect of the SCPC - which would imply a much longer article than the one at hand - but rather to focus on the most important details. In that respect, we will place focus on the SCPC's competencies (functions, tasks and powers) and discuss if they are properly designed. Furthermore, we will tackle the institutional design and the capacities of the institution, so to illuminate the existing discrepancy between this ACA's de-jure competencies and de-facto possibilities. Thirdly, we will speak of its effectiveness. Doing so, we will not only draw the attention of the international research community to the SCPC but also enable comparative research in the future. What is especially valuable to note is that in terms of many of its characteristics, the SCPC is compared to other ACAs in the region of Southeastern Europe too, meaning that an initial contrast has been set. Finally, the main findings of the text are such that an answer for improvement cannot be provided instantly, but additional work in the field is required. Thus, one can only hope that this research inspires other individuals and professionals in the sphere too.
Publisher
مركز حكم القانون ومكافحة الفساد
Subject
