Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Sociopragmatic Study of Accusing in Trump's and Clinton's Political Interviews
by
Dhayef, Qassim Abbas
, Abbas, Wurood Ali
in
الأحداث السياسية
/ الإنتخابات الأمريكية
/ المقابلات السياسية
/ دونالد ترامب
/ هيلاوي كلينتون
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A Sociopragmatic Study of Accusing in Trump's and Clinton's Political Interviews
by
Dhayef, Qassim Abbas
, Abbas, Wurood Ali
in
الأحداث السياسية
/ الإنتخابات الأمريكية
/ المقابلات السياسية
/ دونالد ترامب
/ هيلاوي كلينتون
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A Sociopragmatic Study of Accusing in Trump's and Clinton's Political Interviews
Journal Article
A Sociopragmatic Study of Accusing in Trump's and Clinton's Political Interviews
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Accusing is an intentional act that can be achieved in certain attitudes. The accuser thinks that the accused has done something wrong. The speech act of accusing has been tackled in law and in police officer's false accusation, but it has not been tackled sociopragmatically. So, the present study deals with accusing sociopragmatically in American political interviews. The study aims at: Identifying the sociopragmatic structure of accusing, finding out the speech acts that employed by the accuser and which one is the most frequent, pinpointing the most frequently sociolinguistic variables used in American Political Interviews, specifying the types of accusing and which one is more common in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, exploring the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews. To achieve the aims of the study, it is hypothesized that: Accusing is a process contains three stages, initiating stage, developing stage and completing stage, the speech act of statement is the most frequent in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews, Position is highly utilized by Trump while gender is highly used by Hillary as a sociolinguistic variable, direct accusing is the common type of accusing used by Trump while indirect accusing the common type used by Hillary, attack is the most frequent purpose of accusing in Trump's and Hillary's political interviews.
Publisher
دار الأطروحة للنشر العلمي
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.