Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Strategies of Persuasion in the Political Speeches of Six Jordanian Parties Participating in the Parliamentary Elections in 2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Strategies of Persuasion in the Political Speeches of Six Jordanian Parties Participating in the Parliamentary Elections in 2020
Do you wish to request the book?
The Strategies of Persuasion in the Political Speeches of Six Jordanian Parties Participating in the Parliamentary Elections in 2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Strategies of Persuasion in the Political Speeches of Six Jordanian Parties Participating in the Parliamentary Elections in 2020
2023
Overview
The researcher aims to examine the persuasive strategies of Aristotelian Rhetoric (400. B.C.E); pathos (emotions), logos (reason), and ethos (credibility and trustworthiness) applied in the speeches of six Jordanian parties participating in the parliamentary elections in 2020. The data was chosen on the basis of availability on the Internet, Facebook, YouTube, the Independent Election Commission, The Jordanian Parliament, and the House of Representatives and News Channels before and after the elections, and was collected in a qualitative manner. The researcher compares and contrasts the Aristotelian persuasive strategies in the speeches of the candidates of winning parties, losing parties, and between winning and losing parties together. The findings reveal that all the persuasive strategies of Aristotle's rhetoric are present. In the speeches of their candidates, both the winning and losing parties use logos, pathos, and ethos. They differ, however, in the number and percentage of occurrences those appeals are made. The most dominant appeal is logos, followed by pathos and ethos, with ethos being the least dominant. Finally, it was concluded that persuasive methods are an influential weapon in the hands of candidates, with the potential to influence election results.
Publisher
مركز البحث وتطوير الموارد البشرية - رماح
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.