Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
by
Biederman, Joel A
, Sitch, Stephen
, Goll, Daniel
, Arora, Vivek K
, Litvak, Marcy E
, Nabel, Julia E M S
, Krishnan, Praveena
, Pongratz, Julia
, Moore, David J P
, Scott, Russell L
, Kolb, Thomas
, Bastrikov, Vladislav
, Walker, Anthony P
, Meyers, Tilden P
, MacBean, Natasha
, Zaehle, Sönke
, Lombardozzi, Danica L
, Peylin, Philippe
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
by
Biederman, Joel A
, Sitch, Stephen
, Goll, Daniel
, Arora, Vivek K
, Litvak, Marcy E
, Nabel, Julia E M S
, Krishnan, Praveena
, Pongratz, Julia
, Moore, David J P
, Scott, Russell L
, Kolb, Thomas
, Bastrikov, Vladislav
, Walker, Anthony P
, Meyers, Tilden P
, MacBean, Natasha
, Zaehle, Sönke
, Lombardozzi, Danica L
, Peylin, Philippe
in
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
by
Biederman, Joel A
, Sitch, Stephen
, Goll, Daniel
, Arora, Vivek K
, Litvak, Marcy E
, Nabel, Julia E M S
, Krishnan, Praveena
, Pongratz, Julia
, Moore, David J P
, Scott, Russell L
, Kolb, Thomas
, Bastrikov, Vladislav
, Walker, Anthony P
, Meyers, Tilden P
, MacBean, Natasha
, Zaehle, Sönke
, Lombardozzi, Danica L
, Peylin, Philippe
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
Journal Article
Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Despite their sparse vegetation, dryland regions exert a huge influence over global biogeochemical cycles because they cover more than 40% of the world surface (Schimel 2010 Science 327 418–9). It is thought that drylands dominate the inter-annual variability (IAV) and long-term trend in the global carbon (C) cycle (Poulter et al 2014 Nature 509 600–3, Ahlstrom et al 2015 Science 348 895–9, Zhang et al 2018 Glob. Change Biol . 24 3954–68). Projections of the global land C sink therefore rely on accurate representation of dryland C cycle processes; however, the dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) used in future projections have rarely been evaluated against dryland C flux data. Here, we carried out an evaluation of 14 DGVMs (TRENDY v7) against net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data from 12 dryland flux sites in the southwestern US encompassing a range of ecosystem types (forests, shrub- and grasslands). We find that all the models underestimate both mean annual C uptake/release as well as the magnitude of NEE IAV, suggesting that improvements in representing dryland regions may improve global C cycle projections. Across all models, the sensitivity and timing of ecosystem C uptake to plant available moisture was at fault. Spring biases in gross primary production (GPP) dominate the underestimate of mean annual NEE, whereas models’ lack of GPP response to water availability in both spring and summer monsoon are responsible for inability to capture NEE IAV. Errors in GPP moisture sensitivity at high elevation forested sites were more prominent during the spring, while errors at the low elevation shrub and grass-dominated sites were more important during the monsoon. We propose a range of hypotheses for why model GPP does not respond sufficiently to changing water availability that can serve as a guide for future dryland DGVM developments. Our analysis suggests that improvements in modeling C cycle processes across more than a quarter of the Earth’s land surface could be achieved by addressing the moisture sensitivity of dryland C uptake.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.