Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
FCPA and TCA: Introducing the Presumptions of Final Judgment and Joint Investigation
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
FCPA and TCA: Introducing the Presumptions of Final Judgment and Joint Investigation
Do you wish to request the book?
FCPA and TCA: Introducing the Presumptions of Final Judgment and Joint Investigation
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
FCPA and TCA: Introducing the Presumptions of Final Judgment and Joint Investigation
2019
Overview
Abstract On February 2, 2016, the Congress of Colombia passed the Transnational Corruption Act (\"TCA\") in an effort to fight international corruption like the Foreign Corruption Practices Act (\"FCPA\") does in U.S. This paper explains why TCA and FCPA define different legal standards for corporate liability. It also explains how these differences increase economic costs for legal entities doing business in Colombia and U.S. Against this backdrop, this paper suggests the implementation of one universal set of anti-corruption rules. However, based on the unlikeliness of achieving such an international consensus, it also suggests that law enforcement agencies enforce anti-bribery statutes such as the TCA and FCPA under certain rebuttable presumptions.
Resumen El 2 de febrero de 2016, el Congreso de Colombia aprobó la ley sobre corrupción transnacional (\"TCA\"), un esfuerzo local por combatir la corrupción internacional como lo es la Foreign Corruption Practices Act (FCPA) en Estados Unidos. Este artículo explica por qué TCA y FCPA definen estándares legales diferentes para la responsabilidad corporativa. También explica por qué estas diferencias incrementan los costos económicos para las entidades legales con negocios en Colombia y EE.UU. En ese contexto, este artículo sugiere la implementación de un cuerpo universal de reglas anticorrupción. Sin embargo, con base en las pocas probabilidades de obtener un consenso internacional de este tipo, también sugiere que las agencias encargadas apliquen leyes anticorrupción como lo son TCA y FCPA bajo ciertas presunciones rebatibles.
