Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated text
by
Alvin Ping Leong
in
abstracts
/ Bard
/ ChatGPT
/ clause complexing
/ generative AI
/ Poe Assistant
2025
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated text
by
Alvin Ping Leong
in
abstracts
/ Bard
/ ChatGPT
/ clause complexing
/ generative AI
/ Poe Assistant
2025
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated text
Journal Article
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated text
2025
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The ability of chatbots to produce plausible, human-like responses raises questions about the extent of their similarity with original texts. Using a modified version of Halliday’s clause-complexing framework, this study compared 50 abstracts of scientific research articles from Nature with generated versions produced by Bard, ChatGPT, and Poe Assistant. None of the chatbots matched the original abstracts in all categories. The only chatbot that came closest was ChatGPT, but differences in the use of finite adverbial clauses and –ing elaborating clauses were detected. Incorporating distinct grammatical features in the algorithms of AI-detection tools is crucially needed to enhance the reliability of their results. A genre-based approach to detecting AI-generated content is recommended.
Publisher
University of Tuzla, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.