Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Constructing the Form of Government through Discourse in 2003 and 2009. The Semi-presidential Republic in the Romanian Constitution
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Constructing the Form of Government through Discourse in 2003 and 2009. The Semi-presidential Republic in the Romanian Constitution
Do you wish to request the book?
Constructing the Form of Government through Discourse in 2003 and 2009. The Semi-presidential Republic in the Romanian Constitution
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Constructing the Form of Government through Discourse in 2003 and 2009. The Semi-presidential Republic in the Romanian Constitution
2012
Overview
While, analytically, the character of the Romanian regime is sui generis and the consensus is absent, disputes and instability are the rule of political practice in the existing constitutional design. The article proposes a constructivist perspective of discursive institutionalism. It examines how political actors themselves have characterized the Romanian form of government in order to find equilibrium in the political system. The analyzed material originates in the 2003 debate on the revision of the Constitution and the 2009 speech the President gave on a proposed future revision. The conclusion shows a consistent position of parties, according to their genesis and their ability to propose a presidential personality. Also, the poor quality of the debates can be considered an indication of the inability to resolve disputes that may be anticipated and therefore a „chronicle of crises foretold”.
Publisher
Fundația „Sfera Publică XXI
