Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
What is Wrong with the Pessimistic Induction? Truth and Certainty in the Realism versus Antirealism Debate
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
What is Wrong with the Pessimistic Induction? Truth and Certainty in the Realism versus Antirealism Debate
Do you wish to request the book?
What is Wrong with the Pessimistic Induction? Truth and Certainty in the Realism versus Antirealism Debate
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
What is Wrong with the Pessimistic Induction? Truth and Certainty in the Realism versus Antirealism Debate
2018
Overview
This paper presents an analysis of the debate between realists and anti-realists taking as specific object of study the pessimistic induction and the no-miracles argument. The hypothesis of the paper is that the apparent lack of consensus between realists and anti-realists in addressing the problem of the veracity of our scientific theories is to some extent related to the use of different conceptual frameworks on the truth. Specifically, I will argue that Laudan’s pessimistic induction is a skeptical argument built on a certainty–based concept of truth which is inoperative for understanding the scientific practice. The paper is structured as follows: first, the pessimistic induction and the no-miracles argument are characterized, then the most significant criticisms of both arguments and the replies will be presented and, finally, the validity of the concept of truth underlying those arguments will be briefly analyzed and evaluated.
Publisher
Universidad de Salamanca
Subject
