Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reviews
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reviews
Do you wish to request the book?
Reviews
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Reviews
2013
Overview
(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.) Exclusive Online Reviews In 1974, when the Supreme Court heard DeFunis v. Odegaard, a challenge to the University of Washington Law School's affirmative-action program, Pauli Murray unburdened herself in letters to Justices William O. Douglas and Thurgood Marshall. [...]DeSlippe concludes, these reform-minded critics of affirmative action yielded influence to conservatives, whose clarity of message and political ascendance eventually eclipsed their more progressive predecessors. \"Higher education affirmative action,\" for instance, includes both college admissions policies and faculty employment, different settings governed by different legal rules.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.