MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores
Dissertation

Learning to read and reading to learn: The relationship between Scholastic Reading Inventory scores and CAS mathematics achievement tests scores

2014
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The purpose of this quantitative, correlational study was to investigate the relationship between reading scores, as measured by the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI), and math achievement scores on the State's Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS) test for students enrolled at an urban middle school. This study examined the individual performance of a cohort of students over a two-school year period, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. The sampling included 100 eighth grade middle school students, all of which possessed both variables of the study for the two academic school years. The scholastic reading inventory scores and CAS math scores were converted to identify a student's below-, on-, or above-grade level status. Both a scatter plot, a chart on which the variables are placed to provide a visual representation of their relationship, and the Pearson r correlational test displayed there is a significant correlation between SRI and CAS mathematic scores earned in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Further, statistical findings highlighted a moderate, positive association existed between reading and mathematics scores obtained in 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. A moderate, positive relationship was identified among reading scores and below-, on-, and above-grade level mathematics performance; yet, the above-grade level moderate correlation proved not to be a statistically significant difference. The study's findings supported the theoretical context utilized as underpinning of the research study, as Thorndike and Woodworth (1901) indicated learning acquired in one context supported the learning in another context. Additionally, this study's findings provided educators with tangible strategies to improve students' mathematical performance, while concretely focusing on the bottom lines of education, shrinking school budgets and improved student achievement.