Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Tort Liability and Obstetricians' Care Levels
by
Glass, Cheryl A
, Sloan, Frank
, Hickson, Gerald B
, Zhang, Harold H
, Entman, Stephen S
, Reilly, Bridget A
in
Liability
1995
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Tort Liability and Obstetricians' Care Levels
by
Glass, Cheryl A
, Sloan, Frank
, Hickson, Gerald B
, Zhang, Harold H
, Entman, Stephen S
, Reilly, Bridget A
in
Liability
1995
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
Tort Liability and Obstetricians' Care Levels
1995
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In this study, we assess practice changes made in response to the threat of tort liability in the field of obstetrics, which has one of the highest levels of premiums, claim frequency, and mean dollar value of paid claims. There is much \"conventional wisdom\" about effects of tort liability risk on obstetrical practice based on obstetricians' perceptions of changes that have occurred. Our data comes from the Survey of Obstetrical Care in 1992, a survey of 963 women who had given birth in 1987 in 31 counties in Florida conducted for purposes of this study and related studies of medical malpractice and birth outcomes. Our results suggest that some antenatal testing is responsive to variation in the threat of being used. But for most measures included in our study, half of the antenatal testing variables, the decision to perform a cesarean section, and various dimensions of maternal satisfaction with care, our empirical analysis failed to reveal that obstetricians practice more \"defensively\" in areas with relatively high suit rates.
Publisher
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.