Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A Living Instruments as Applied to Homosexuality
by
Byron, Christine
in
Councils
/ Court decisions
/ Human rights
/ International courts
/ Treaties
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A Living Instruments as Applied to Homosexuality
by
Byron, Christine
in
Councils
/ Court decisions
/ Human rights
/ International courts
/ Treaties
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A Living Instruments as Applied to Homosexuality
Journal Article
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A Living Instruments as Applied to Homosexuality
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The current method of interpretation of the ECHR has its roots in the court's decision in Golder v. United Kingdom, a decision that, ironically, is one of the few in which the court made reference to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.4 Despite the fact that the Vienna Convention was not in force at the time of the decision, the court accepted that articles 31-33 of the Convention (on treaty interpretation) were \"generally accepted principles\" of international law.5 The court carried out its reasoning in the case, based purely on the \"object and purpose\" of the ECHR as a whole, notably not referring to the interpretation of the text that had been intended by the drafters at the time of the adoption of the ECHR.'5 If the ECtHR had taken that approach, it would have had the effect of freezing the interpretation of the human rights of the ECHR at the standard understood in the early 1950s.
Publisher
American Bar Association
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.