Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons
by
Casteele, Niels Vande
, Mantzaris, Gerassimos J
, Levesque, Barrett G
, Zintzaras, Elias
, Gils, Ann
, Miligkos, Michael
, Papamichael, Konstantinos
in
Caregivers
/ Clinical trials
/ Crohn's disease
/ Gangrene
/ Inflammatory bowel disease
/ Patients
/ Pharmaceutical industry
/ Studies
/ Tumor necrosis factor-TNF
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons
by
Casteele, Niels Vande
, Mantzaris, Gerassimos J
, Levesque, Barrett G
, Zintzaras, Elias
, Gils, Ann
, Miligkos, Michael
, Papamichael, Konstantinos
in
Caregivers
/ Clinical trials
/ Crohn's disease
/ Gangrene
/ Inflammatory bowel disease
/ Patients
/ Pharmaceutical industry
/ Studies
/ Tumor necrosis factor-TNF
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons
by
Casteele, Niels Vande
, Mantzaris, Gerassimos J
, Levesque, Barrett G
, Zintzaras, Elias
, Gils, Ann
, Miligkos, Michael
, Papamichael, Konstantinos
in
Caregivers
/ Clinical trials
/ Crohn's disease
/ Gangrene
/ Inflammatory bowel disease
/ Patients
/ Pharmaceutical industry
/ Studies
/ Tumor necrosis factor-TNF
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons
Journal Article
Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose To compare the benefits and harms of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and anti-integrin agents as induction and maintenance therapy in adult patients with Crohn's disease. Methods We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through July 2015 for randomized clinical trials in patients with Crohn's disease who reported response or remission with anti-TNF-α or anti-integrin agents administered as induction and/or maintenance therapy. Data on the study population, interventions, outcome measures, adverse events, and study methods were extracted independently by 2 authors. Findings Among 2503 citations identified, 23 met the eligibility criteria. Random-effects model meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were performed. No statistically significant difference was observed between anti-TNF-α and anti-integrin agents with respect to induction and maintenance of response (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20 [95% CI, 0.73-1.96] from 14 trials and OR = 1.23 [95% CI, 0.50-3.03] from 8 trials, respectively) or remission (OR = 1.13 [95% CI, 0.72-1.76] from 17 trials and OR = 1.18 [95% CI, 0.55-2.50] from 9 trials, respectively). No difference was observed in the indirect comparison of trials that reported results on the subgroup of anti-TNF-α naive patients. The proportions of patients with adverse events, infections, and treatment discontinuations were similar between the agents. Implications Our indirect treatment comparisons did not find a statistically significant difference between anti-TNF-α and anti-integrin agents for induction or maintenance therapy. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, it remains unclear which patient is more likely to respond better to any of these agents.
Publisher
Elsevier Limited
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.