Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
P32 Ensuring sp safety during invasive optometry assessments
by
Kaff, S
in
Optometry
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Do you wish to request the book?
P32 Ensuring sp safety during invasive optometry assessments
by
Kaff, S
in
Optometry
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
P32 Ensuring sp safety during invasive optometry assessments
Journal Article
P32 Ensuring sp safety during invasive optometry assessments
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background At our institution, we hold OSCEs for Internationally Educated Optometrists, for which Standardised Patients are used. The stations involve invasive optometric procedures; as such, the SPs' safety is paramount. We have developed a process to ensure SP safety and comfort throughout the training and examination process. While standardisation is at the forefront of any assessment, SP safety is of greatest importance during Optometry OSCEs. In this session, we will present the methods that have been developed for ensuring SP safety during the assessments. Outcomes The methods we have developed over the last 3 years of conducting the optometry assessment have ensured that the SPs are safe during interactions with candidates. While the SPs are screened before recruitment, they may still have different reactions to the methods used by the candidates during the assessment. Our exam day processes are as such that these reactions are limited or non-existent. As of May 2017, we have had no major incidents or injuries to the SPs. Conclusion Over the last two years of this assessment, we have found that different procedures require different safeguards for the SPs. What we have developed has been instrumental in protecting the SPs as well as providing a valid and reliable assessment for the candidates.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subject
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.