Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Academic Unfreedom, Unacademic Freedom
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Academic Unfreedom, Unacademic Freedom
Do you wish to request the book?
Academic Unfreedom, Unacademic Freedom
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Academic Unfreedom, Unacademic Freedom
2017
Overview
On Mar 6, at a moment when commentaries on the Middlebury affair had reached fever pitch, around a third of the Middlebury faculty signed and endorsed a document called \"Free Inquiry on Campus: A Statement of Principles by over One Hundred Middlebury College Professors,\" which was published the next day in the Wall Street Journal. As a defense of academic freedom, it is a peculiar document, to say the least. It's best described as a highly condensed version of the dominant doctrine of academic freedom (comprised of a partial interpretation of the First Amendment and summaries of Millian libertarianism), which its signatories present as \"unassailable.\" Here, Sitze presents the second part of his article about the Middlebury affair.
Publisher
Massachusetts Review, Inc
Subject
