Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Analyses of School Psychology Training Program Praxis™ II Outcomes 2010-2012: Distinctions without a Difference?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Analyses of School Psychology Training Program Praxis™ II Outcomes 2010-2012: Distinctions without a Difference?
Do you wish to request the book?
Analyses of School Psychology Training Program Praxis™ II Outcomes 2010-2012: Distinctions without a Difference?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Analyses of School Psychology Training Program Praxis™ II Outcomes 2010-2012: Distinctions without a Difference?
2017
Overview
Earning a passing score on the Educational Testing Service (ETS) School Psychology Praxis™ II examination is a requirement for obtaining national certification as well as the requisite credential to practice in most states. However, empirical investigations of the technical characteristics and relevant outcomes related to Praxis™ II School Psychology exam scores in the professional literature have been scarce. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to examine the degree to which 2010-2012 Praxis™ II outcomes were affected by salient characteristics of school psychology training programs. Significant differences in aggregate program scores were observed when examining the effects of program accreditation status and training-level (e.g., specialist versus doctoral) on exam outcomes. These results suggest that additional consideration of specific training program attributes may be beneficial when appraising variability in performance on the Praxis™ II exam. Implications for professional practice and the training of school psychologists are discussed. Keywords: Praxis™ II, Professional credentialing, Accreditation, Training
Publisher
Trainers of School Psychologists
