Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of Measurement Comparisons Using Generalised Least Squares: the Role of Participants' Estimates of Systematic Error
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of Measurement Comparisons Using Generalised Least Squares: the Role of Participants' Estimates of Systematic Error
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of Measurement Comparisons Using Generalised Least Squares: the Role of Participants' Estimates of Systematic Error
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Paper
Evaluation of Measurement Comparisons Using Generalised Least Squares: the Role of Participants' Estimates of Systematic Error
2012
Overview
We consider the evaluation of laboratory practice through the comparison of measurements made by participating metrology laboratories when the measurement procedures are considered to have both fixed effects (the residual error due to unrecognised sources of error) and random effects (drawn from a distribution of known variance after correction for all known systematic errors). We show that, when estimating the participant fixed effects, the random effects described can be ignored. We also derive the adjustment to the variance estimates of the participant fixed effects due to these random effects.
Publisher
Cornell University Library, arXiv.org
Subject
