Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Irruptions of Motive in the War on Terrordagger
by
Plaxton, Michael
in
Anti-terrorism Act-Canada
/ Counterterrorism
/ Criminal law
/ Criminal liability
/ Disputes
/ Liability
/ Political factors
/ Social criticism & satire
/ Supreme Court decisions
/ Terrorism
2007
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Irruptions of Motive in the War on Terrordagger
by
Plaxton, Michael
in
Anti-terrorism Act-Canada
/ Counterterrorism
/ Criminal law
/ Criminal liability
/ Disputes
/ Liability
/ Political factors
/ Social criticism & satire
/ Supreme Court decisions
/ Terrorism
2007
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Irruptions of Motive in the War on Terrordagger
2007
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
In R. v. Khawaja, Rutherford J. severed the motive requirement from the definition of terrorism contained in section 83.01 of the Criminal Code. In doing so, he drew upon the traditional doctrine that motive is irrelevant to criminal liability. This article disputes the idea that motive is irrelevant. It makes the modest argument that the criminal law has long passed political judgements on the value or disvalue of particular motives, and that if political factors creep into the definition of terrorism, it does so in the criminal law generally. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Publisher
HAB Press Limited
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.